I- Niirn. Sci. Cul~n. Sli LaliLa 1951 5 (1) : Sali~ary Xn3mnun~glob~iins annd L,actofeeurisr is Dersttal Caries S- DISSANAYAKE, L- P. SAMARAN A YAKE Faculty of k / L r ! i c i n d , 7 :n i~-?r j l !~ o i ['rrri&:,ni7c, P r ~ g r ! i r ~ i : ; : , S7i li n2 .. )'.N r> li. M. BENNETT Il~liartli ,s:lt D; Mei!ic:;le. ! 'ni<:e:-sity O{ Chiingc, C,!l icClgo, i!/ili,,is, i:. S. ,-1 (Date of ::c~.ipt ; 07 bioi~ll 1080) (Date o! ,::cceptm:i- : .<.j J n n r : a i ) i gBr ) Abstract: :'Ile I c r ~ c ! ~ of seru::-: JpG, [PA, saiiv;,~'; IgA :.n-! salivary lactcifcrrin wcrr: dcl.ernlin& high unii. io\v cnrics r u b j r c t s . The !c.se!s of i n ~ r i ~ u r r ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ - u ! i r r i~rtd !:!ctt;fcrrilr m2l-c fL:und ti) be e;ex~ntci: in l i i ~ h car-irs ~ubjccrs . Nrsmcrous studfes have shown ~ a r i a t i o n s i c ; serum a d salivary immunoglobulins i n dental caries, 4 . 7 3 " s 1 5 7 some reports suggesting a prorectivc function for salivary imrr~irr-\oglobulins. "4.5.9-i:i. Lactrjlcrrin, t he iron a n d cospcr bindjng protein in ~ e c r e t i o n s , ~ is present in saliva and has bttm described as a bacteriostatic: agent.' As bacteria play asigr-ai- iicant r o l e in th:: csrablishmrnt :!nd progress o!: dental c;~ries, ir is imprp~tn r~ t re, knnu, wherket- Iactoferrin levels show a n y relztiort to the scveritv of ciiseasc. in this cornmunicariun, we summarise o u r I?relimi;~ary dara o n serum irnxnu- r~oglob~i l ins , salivary immunoglobulins and lai toferrin in denra! caries in man. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1, Subjects The series consizrei! of 122 patients selected from those a l terding an POtlt Paeietlcs' clinic, at the Genera! iiospiral, Ka.ndy and 28 caries .free Cirst year lnedica1 stuciellts f rom Peradeni)-a. The medical s t r td i r~ts werc freshmen an6 were studied within one nlorarh of rheir arrival in rhe campus. 'Their family income was used ro assess t l>e socio-t'conomic backgrourlds arid 28 students of sacio-economic s ta tus ce>mpara'o!e to that of the test group were selected. All subjects were oxamined by the same clcnta! surgeon anci those patients wit11 evidence uf othcr oral diseases, ejpecialiy gingivitis, wcrr excluded. 'The dcgrec wS denta l caries was measured hi: [-he umber of decayed, missing a n d filjed teeth [DMF Index). 'The subjects were classified accorcling to ~11c DMF lndcx, 2 .2, Collection of saliva a d sexam, About 5 to 10 1x1 of saliva v,:ere collected und:r ra i -a f f i i~ sri;:-.ulatioc f rcm i . a c l ~ subjcct. The time of: saliva col!ecricn mas bctxvecn 10 ::In and 12 nocm. The saliva samples wtre cIarifieci by centri~ugaticn (2C.0 g) and scored n t -2,CI"C. Blocd %as coilected into Hacrnatocrit tubes by :rhefir?ger prick rneti~od, serum s~,p:~racetj ~ ~ n d stored at -20" C. l.Jnconccntrateci saliva was used in al l dctcn-:lin:itions SigA Ic~:cIs k.1 salivz vzcrc dctcrmined by Single Radial immu;lodiiiusicn (SRIII)) in I.lij:," itga;.o~t. using a rabbit ar:tiser u ~ n (sFecilic) i.0 Luman S IgA ( ?Jar-dic l i~ i in~~i io lo~: ic :~I Laborntorics; clae Net-!ler!a~~ds). Thc 1 1 Igi\ stacdar-ii u.:?s 1:rr.par-rd in .ii>is laboratory. Ser"jm TgG asid laA icvcis xv(:ic d~tci-rni~zc~i by SZlC ill 256 Ag:~;ost: usi!~::, cliiss specific zritisera (Nordic I r n r ~ ~ i a o l o ~ i c d 2,:tb:)r2to:-icr;j u : i t?~ rcirrcr~ce to t b e ' ~ i - 1 0 Stn~zdard Se:um 6'119'3. IiS IgA (as determined by gel filtration on. :i cnlibrilticl Scr>l-~:ic!cs C;-ZClj c o l u ~ ~ n ) was isijlatcd f rom hurK~a i l colostrum. ( ; r ; i ~ ! ~ ; ~ - - g ; l ~ L u l i i ~ : ; in Piui\l;i~l coli>strurn were isolatcd by r?peated precipitation with 3.3% a : i imu!~i~im r:riiph:iic in phcspl~atc buffer, pH 7.4. 11s I g A was olotxir~ec! b y ;rcl filtration in t11c c:!ii 'u~-a-i-eJ Sc.ilihai'ie,; G--2CO column 2nd f i ? i ~ l : ~ r pu!- i ( icdhj~ afliriity i i l roi l inr~; : , , r ;?~I~~ c?si CNi3r--Sepiiarosl- 4C i i~sol~~bi l izcd i-ahbit- anti.- l ~ ~ i r i - i o ~ SI!;A ( f r o ~ i ~ Nordii: imn\.cinslosical L;i%orz:ories, tlir: N c ~ h e i l ~ n d : , ) . '1 l ~ c ! IS i::,4 thus pi-i.puretl showed one precipitation line o n irnmr:noeTec.trc~pl~oi'i'sis a~~ai i ls t r:il->bir anti- h u i l l n ~ l Fab and rabbit a n t i - l ~ u ~ n ~ ~ n S igA (Nordic Immuno!u;;ii:li L:!l:i~ra~orics]. C;;lculaiion of standard c o n c c n ~ r a i i o ~ ; ~ sins baticci oil thc nssuir:cd cx~ii!c;:ion cotlfficienr for SIgA of F: :,h':m 1 oi, =-: 13. i i . ' V 7 h i s p;cpa;-:~:ion \xT,ias 3lt.o c31i bratcd against the WHO Standard Srrui:~ 6'ii97 ~ ~ i t h a corrci-tioil factor applied for differences in rates of diffusion." Dztcrxnir>ation cf salivary lnctcierritl i cvc ls was p f r f~ rmcd by su!id ?3Jih)- ~ ! I ~ ~ w I I I ) ; ~ s s ~ ~ exactly 2s desci.ibic! previoujly.~ The number of subiects in fach caries grc,up, .ihc nlran S. D, of their :12;ci UMF Index, Ieve!s of seru1a.l IgG, iF;A, salivsry ipA, a n d ':acca~c.;:in arc shou~n j11 'Table !. In Tsb!e 2 are slliocvrx :he statiztic.1 correlations (by linear rcgrc;sii-.(-I anzlysis) bctwecn salivary !gA, lactof'errin and t h e DMF I:ldex, \)rjhen the U k F Ii-\des was greater than 15, the mean serum IgG i r v e \ s w c ~ c sigr:ificantly grca:er th;:n t h a t of the control group w i th a DMF :Indcx=:O. T!?e salivnl-y lgA ai>d 1nc:ofzrrin !eire!s sllov~ed a gradunl increase wirh the iccreasc ur' DMF Index. In high czries si lhjccts {DMF l n i e x - 11-15 a n d 15) the mcnr! Icvel:; of ~a! i -L '~r~ 19.4 ail(! lac:olcrriil cvevc sigi?ificantly higher than t l ; ~ corrcspor~ding i-aluss {or the concro! group with DMF %ndcx - 0. -7 ~ . ~ ~ b ! c 3 - 'f!,e T'iv/l~zil, -:- 3. D. of &e, D?../lF' Xndex Scrum Serum IgA, - .7 hn! i .~n r \ i !gh ari:! Sal ivar .~ L3.cioTei-rin. . ~ ~ .-- -~ -- - - - - - , . .- '" : d.iffrrc:lie il.<:rn DMF 1nd . e~ :- O , :isailiir:nt at 20% level, :; .i : dIi;crci:cc irt : i~i OMF Incicu - I? , big;lifLcanr :xt OO.Cf.% ?etel. Su!~jcct C r u u p Salivary 1gA and !..>ctofe;riti acd. l.zctufcrl.in ar?d 9 M F h a e x DMF Index I g h c o r r s ' n r i o ~ ~ currelacion corrclar ion . < l>b!F l!xcl?x = J-3 , ; .--0.163 , NS ,: 0-063 N S ,, 0.062 NS DMF Inii.::< - 6 -10 ,, 2-348 ,? - 0.01 , , 0.036 NS , , 0.035 NS NS : i!oe significant. Subjects with a DMF !ndex greatcr than 15 exhibited a significantly eEevnted lrvel of serum IgG: thz group crith a DMF Indes = I1 :o 15 (but not s?~orre 15) exhibited a significant elevation of se rum I g h . These findings a re in general. agreement. with orher reports."' I n corrtrast, salivary IgA. a n d i;rctofcrrir~ demonstrated. a g r a d u ~ l increase :vitll the increase of the DMF Index. Thestan-- dard deviarigns were so high, ho~vevrr , that only in thc grous with DMF Index greater t h a ~ i 15 (grearer than 10 for :actoferrin) was the difference fro-ns) tkc conerc>l group silt'ficient to be statistically significanr. To our kncwlcdge, this is the tirst report on elcvated levels of lacrocerrin in ifenti1 caries. The corrcentratioil of salivary proteins arc kno-r~n t o be a lfectccl by the rate of: saliva ~ec re t i on .~ . '' Hos~cver, it is not known to what estcnt t.hes.2 cxpcxi- mentally determined differences -refiest true diiierences irr [he glandular- secrr- t ion of salivary prcttins. In the present investigation, M ~ C \\rere nor zble to il-reasure t h e rates of saliva secretiorl and r:hereiore, it was not pcrssihJr to correct for differences in rates of flow. The ahsolute levels of salivary L ~ K observed in the present series are Pzighcr th.an the values reported b y other:. 4.6,10,12-" S S U C ~ lariati ions IT^ to be expected for reasons of cthn.ic, social and econonlic diffcrcnccs, Howc\;er, tcchz-rica! exrors dare to differel~ccs in Standard SIgA preparations canriot of cor1i:se be exclt~dccl. TJnfor?:unately an international standard for SIgA is not avsi!ablc and therefore accurtitc standardizations coultl not hr madc. The p:.ltr.reri of iiari.;tion of salivary 134. it^^ rciotio~> ro thr DMl; 1od.e:"; pro-- bab'lv reflects the stImujation of salivary ZgA production by antigerrs af cariogenic organisms. A deficiency of secre:or\: immunogIobulii-rs in saliva p~eripitatin,a dental. caries seems vniikely. Tile significance of tine observed slcvatiasn ni sali- vary lactuferrin in high caries subjects is n.ot cicar, Further studics TO clncidate the ~.cXk: of lactofcrriar in dental caries a.rrd also the antibody spec,ificity of salFbrary IgA. arc. irii progress. References 3 . R E X N E T T , R., bl. tx MOHLA, C (1976) 3 . L:lh. cli;l. Md. 88 : 156. 2. BULLEN, 1. I., RoGZRS H. 1 . h LElGH, C . (1972) Br. Mi.rl. 1. 1 : 69- 3. BRANDTZAEG P. (1976) !. d e n t . RPC [Speci:%l issue) 55 : c 102. 4. CHA.LLACOMBF S. 1. (1976) C a y i t s R c s . 10 : 16.5. 5. COLE, M. F., ARNOLD, R. l i . , RFIODES, M. I.& McGHEE, j . K..(?977)!. ilcnt. Hrs. $ti : 1.95. 6. EVEREAlXT, D. L., GRlGSBY, Y2. K. & CARTER; %I. H. (1972) ?. ilrnr. r\i.s. 51 : 1487. 7. 1-EHNER. T., CARDWELL, J . E. & CL-kRRY, E. 11). (1967) L t l i i i ~ f :I : 1291. MAhSOh, P. C. B HEREMANS, 1. F. 11956) 1';otlilcs Biol. FIuir!s Pm;. Co l lug B: ugcr. IJ : 115. MICHALEK, S. M .> >.,icGFlLE. J. R.: MESTECKY, J., AP.PJ31-D, K. R. t? EOZZO, L. (1976) SciencL< 192 : 123R. ORST'KAVIR, D . 3 BRANDTZAEG, P. (1975) ,'.;hs. or:!! Gio! . 20 : 701. SHKLAIR, t. I.., ROVELSTED, G. M. cz X.AMBERTS, R. C. ( 1 9 ~ 9 ) .I. dk.r.r. KC.. m : M I . Si-IILLITC>E, E. j. t? LEHNER, T. (!912> ,4ri!?.;. ol-&i! Bio!. .L7 : 24.j. ?'.4UBMPLX, M. A. f? SIdITH, 2. J. (i974) !nfr.c:ion !n:m~!nity 5) : 1070. TOM.+\S!. J. 8. B GREY, ti. M. (1972) In " S t ~ i ~ c t t i ~ e @ f~.ii;ctio;; 3,: i i ~ ~ > ? ~ ~ i t i ( ~ g l f , ! - ~ ~ i i i t t -&'. Pro::. A l l r r g y . L 6 : 18-213. Kmger, 8c.i~~:. ZEXGO: A. 9 , M.AbJDEL, 1 . D., GOLDMAN, R, 8 KHURA.NA, Y . 5. (~1971) , 4 : - i h ~ . o,ol Rioi, IF :557 JNSF9_1_35.pdf JNSF9_1_35 (2).pdf JNSF9_1_35 (3).pdf JNSF9_1_35 (4).pdf